H.265 VS H.264, What’s The Significant Advantages
- 12 Jun 2017
- 5089 Read
H.265, also known as High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC), is the successor standard to H.264, and
has generated huge optimism given Industry's struggle with shortage of bandwidth, spectrum, storage
and imminent need to take growing HD content for multi platform delivery.Compared with the existing
popular video coding standard H. 264, H.265 keeps some of the original technologies, and adopts
the advanced techniques to improve the bit-stream, promote the coding quality, and create a better
relationship between time delay and algorithm complexity, to achieve best optimizations as far as
Today, we will make detailed H264 vs H265 (as well as HEVC vs H264) comparisons on them.
1, Differences between H.265/HEVC and H.264:
Some of the key differences between H.265 (HEVC) and H.264 (MPEG 4 AVC) are listed below
MPEG 4 Part 10 AVC
(Introduced in 2004)
MPEG-H, HEVC, Part 2
(Approved in Jan 2013 )
Dominant and accepted video
codec forTerrestrial,Cable, Satellite
and IPTV broadcast.
(ATSC/DVB/ISDB) Widely used
across Blu Ray, security systems,
vide conferencing, mobile video,
media players, video chat etc.
across NAB, IBC and other events
starting 2012 from companies e.g.
ATEME, Broadcom, Thomson,
Harmonic (Cisco), Ericsson,
Qualcomm etc. Increased R&D across
Encoder/Decoder /CE,vendors for
software and hardware based solutions
40-50% bit rate reduction
compared to MPEG-2
40-50% the bit rate reduction
at the same visual quality
compared to H.264
Led the growth of HD content
delivery for Broadcast and Online
Potential to realize UHD, 2K, 4K
for Broadcast and Online (OTT)
|Progression||Successor to MPEG-2 Part||Successor to MPEG 4 AVC, H.264|
Enhanced Hybrid spatial-temporal
Flexible partition of Macro Block (MB) ,
sub MB for motion estimation
Flexible partitioning, introduces Coding
Tree Units (Coding, Prediction and
Transform Units -CU, PU, TU)
Intra Prediction (extrapolate already
decoded neighboring pixels for prediction)
- 35 directional modes
for intra prediction
|- Introduced multi-view extension||
- Superior parallel processing
enhancements in multi-view
9 directional modes for
CTU supporting larger block
structure(64x64) with more
variable sub partition structures
Macro Blocks structure with
maximum size of 16x16 Entropy coding is
CABAC and CAVLC
|Entropy coding is only CABAC|
|Specification||Support Up to 4K (4,096×2,304)||Up to 8K UHDTV (8192×4320)|
Supports up to 59.94 fps
21 profiles ; 17 levels
Supports up to 300 fps
profiles, draft for additional 5 ; 13 levels
Unrealistic for UHD content
delivery due to high bit rate
support restricted to 59.94
(~ 300 % + ) due to larger
prediction units and expensive
Motion.Estimation (Intra prediction
with more nodes, asymmetric
partitions in Inter Prediction).
2, H.265 vs H.264 Compression Ratio & Bandwidth Utilization
H.265 has better compression performance and lower bandwidth utilization ratio.
For video services, the ultimate goal of compressing a movie is to reduce the size of the movie file, so that it
can take up less storage space, as well as reduce the network bandwidth consumption in transmission.
Compared with H. 264, the greatest strength of H. 265 is that it has a higher H.265 compression ratio, which can
be just discerned from its name, which is also called HEVC (High Efficiency Video Coding), and the primary use is
to further reduce the design flow rate, in order to lower the cost of storage and transmission.
In other words, at the same quality of coding, H.265 video can save around 50% of the bit rate, and the coding
efficiency can be doubled than H. 264, as H.265 provides more different tools to reduce the bit rate. For example,
in H. 264, each macroblock is fixed to the size of 16 x16 pixels, but the coding unit of H.265 can be chosen from
a minimum of 8 x 8 to the maximum of 64 x 64.
3. H.265 vs H.264 Quality
0n the left hand side as the illustration shows above is using traditional H.264 standard, and each macro block
is fixed; In H. 264 coding technology, the giant sections of data is completely independent to each other, so coding
distortion situations are likely to happen in border areas of the giant block.
It is H. 265 standard on the right, the size of code unit is determined by the regional information. From the image
contrast, we can see the video quality enhancement and the more delicate character’s skin under H. 265 are much
better than H. 264.
3. H.264 vs H.265 File Size
H.265 will become a widely used codec in the near future as it's really one of the best way to compress a video with
original quality being remained.
Most of sdmc's OTT set-top boxes can support 4Kp60 H.265 HEVC Main-10 Decoding, For more info at